From: | xbdelacour(at)yahoo(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Ragnar Kjørstad <postgres(at)ragnark(dot)vestdata(dot)no> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Large database help |
Date: | 2001-04-24 00:15:05 |
Message-ID: | 5.0.2.1.0.20010423200655.019bb6c0@pop.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
ANote: some disk activety should be expected. Maybe postgresql updates
>the log? Or at the very least it will update the atime timestamps for
>the files everytime they're read. This shouldn't cause enough disk
>activity to become a performance-problem, but if I remember your initial
>post correctly, you indicated that one processor was fully saturated.
>
>Maybe the problem is in fact related to locking and smp, and not related
>to shared-memory and disk activity?
Then, please correct me if I'm wrong: I should be able to test your
hypothesis by creating a small DB (of say 2MB) and setting up at least a
dozen backends to tag it. If I get the same symptoms w/ respect to disk
activity/performance then we could say that the problem is not related to
shared memory/the amount of data/swapping.
What log files are output from postgres? I was under the impression that
postmaster's stdout/stderr were the only output. I've been postmaster
xyz >& log.txt'ing it. I'll check into this.
Thanks a lot for your help :-)
-Xavier
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-04-24 00:24:16 | Re: Large database help |
Previous Message | Ragnar Kjørstad | 2001-04-24 00:06:26 | Re: Large database help |