| From: | Soma Interesting <dfunct(at)telus(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: dynamic field names in a function. |
| Date: | 2001-03-30 22:34:21 |
| Message-ID: | 5.0.2.1.0.20010330142615.023d49a0@pop.telus.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 04:09 PM 3/30/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>An alternative would be to do the the work at the application level, i.e.
>the point where the data is collected. You could use any language you like
>for that.
This has ran through my mind as an option - the project is a web
application with php and postgres, but a number of factors involved makes
it really undesirable to do this at the application level - to the point
that its worth my while to learn pl/pgsql, perl, or tcl to avoid it - or
possibly even C - none of which I know... yet :)
So I repeat the question, not to be obnoxious - but to be sure, "does
anyone *know* if any of the languages available for writing functions would
allow a field name to be referenced using a variable as all or part of the
field name?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ed Loehr | 2001-03-30 22:43:40 | PL/pgSQL parameter passing bug? |
| Previous Message | Daniel Serodio | 2001-03-30 22:27:30 | Locale and LIKE matching |