From: | Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Java class documentation |
Date: | 2001-02-24 18:03:03 |
Message-ID: | 5.0.2.1.0.20010224174716.009fa910@mail.retep.org.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-jdbc |
At 16:00 23/02/01 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Could we for now remove the formal class documentation from the DocBook
> > source, while keeping the narrative parts, and instead point people to the
> > JavaDoc? Could we make prebuild class documentation in HTML available to
> > users, maybe where the jars are downloaded?
>
>Works for me. Not sure if we have rules for building javadoc in our
>makefiles, but I'm sure it would be easy to add if necessary. Peter M,
>what do you think?
As I just replied to PeterE, I was waiting for 7.1 to be out before
rewriting the docs from scratch. I was waiting because of time restraints
and I didn't want to mess up the exiting docs, especially as I knew you
needed time before release with the docs static.
What I'm working on for the jdbc site is a set of API docs explaining the
PostgreSQL specific extensions, and a set of tutorials. The tutorials range
from the basic stuff (replacing the examples in the source), to writing
Servlets with PostgreSQL, EJB's, Corba etc.
Now a Javadoc->DocBook converter should be easy. In fact you can get
javadoc to do it for you using the Doclet API. Should be real easy to do.
Peter
> - Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-24 23:28:33 | Re: Java class documentation |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2001-02-24 17:47:00 | Re: Java class documentation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2001-02-24 18:04:23 | Re: f is not a valid bitstring |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2001-02-24 17:47:00 | Re: Java class documentation |