| From: | Matt Gibbins <matt_gibbins(at)fastmail(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Segmentation fault when running queries in sequence |
| Date: | 2023-09-24 02:50:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4fbf8190-92f7-4272-8b71-3bc2f8029e71@fastmail.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 24/9/23 10:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matt Gibbins <matt_gibbins(at)fastmail(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> I executed continue and the gdb reported '[Detaching after fork from
>> child process 2790431]' for several sequences and the remote process
>> then crashed.
> I think this means that you attached to the parent postmaster
> process, not to the per-session child process where the crash
> will occur.
>
> On the whole, attaching to a live server process is kind of the
> hard way to do this anyhow. I'd recommend enabling saving of
> core dump files and then gdb'ing the core file. That avoids
> needing to identify in advance the process that is going to crash.
>
> regards, tom lane
Tom
Thank you for your patience.
I have now created a core dump of the process. It is approximately 4G in
size.
Rather large for an email.
As I am not familiar with core dump processing I require some further
guidance.
Matt.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-09-24 02:56:50 | Re: Segmentation fault when running queries in sequence |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-09-24 00:54:34 | Re: Segmentation fault when running queries in sequence |