| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Incremental sorts and EXEC_FLAG_REWIND |
| Date: | 2020-05-07 22:54:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4f3a1505-48de-becf-d86f-006f71137f2c@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/7/20 5:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:58:47PM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
>> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> With Beta 1 just around the corner[1], I wanted to check in to see if
>>> this was closer to being committed so we could close off the open
>>> item[2] prior the beta release.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b782a4ec-5e8e-21a7-f628-624be683e6d6@postgresql.org
>>>
>>> [2] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items
>>
>>
>> Tangential, I know, but I think we should consider [1] (includes a
>> very minor patch) part of the open items on incremental sort also:
>>
>
> Yes, I do plan to get both those issues fixed in the next coupld of days
> (certainly in time for beta 1).
Excellent - thank you!
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-05-07 23:28:55 | Re: 2pc leaks fds |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-05-07 22:17:14 | Re: pg_restore error message |