| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Separate memory contexts for relcache and catcache |
| Date: | 2024-11-11 21:27:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4edadffe14ead8860f4d02141aaf154871fef0cb.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 17:05 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> It will be good
> to move ahead with the ones we all agree for now. Looking at all the
> emails, those will be CatCacheContext,
> RelCacheContext, PlanCacheContext, TypCacheContext.
I'm not sure we have consensus on all of those yet. Andres's concern,
IIUC, is that the additional memory contexts will cause additional
fragmentation.
I believe we have a rough consensus that CatCacheContext and
RelCacheContext are wanted, but we're trying to find ways to mitigate
the fragmentation.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michel Pelletier | 2024-11-11 21:34:06 | Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Michel Pelletier | 2024-11-11 21:27:12 | Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql |