From: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Runtime control of CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS |
Date: | 2020-11-30 12:38:37 |
Message-ID: | 4ed7c43e-7a32-26bc-d945-8e0e22d110af@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 27.10.2020 11:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-09-25 09:40, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> While working on extensions I've often wanted to enable cache
>> clobbering for a targeted piece of code, without paying the price of
>> running it for all backends during postgres startup and any initial
>> setup tasks that are required.
>>
>> So here's a patch that, when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS or
>> CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVE are defined, adds a GUC named
>> clobber_cache_depth . It defaults to 1 for CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS or 3
>> for CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVE to match the existing compiled-in
>> behaviour. But with this change it's now possible to run Pg with
>> clobber_cache_depth=0 then set it to 1 only for targeted tests.
>>
>> clobber_cache_depth is treated as an unknown GUC if Pg was not built
>> with CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS or CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVE defined.
>
> I think it would be great if the cache clobber code is always compiled
> in (but turned off) when building with assertions. The would reduce
> the number of hoops to jump through to actually use this locally and
> reduce the number of surprises from the build farm.
>
> For backward compatibility, you can arrange it so that the built-in
> default of clobber_cache_depth is 1 or 3 if CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS or
> CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVE are defined.
>
Status update for a commitfest entry.
This thread was inactive during the commitfest, so I am going to mark it
as "Returned with Feedback".
Craig, are you planning to continue working on it? The proposed idea is
great and it looks like the patch needs only a minor improvement.
--
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2020-11-30 12:40:23 | Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists |
Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2020-11-30 12:28:35 | Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists |