From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using logical replication with older version subscribers |
Date: | 2019-01-07 12:48:40 |
Message-ID: | 4e1b30fe-f790-b567-6e9a-1808dc9229f6@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/01/2019 10:54, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I assume you are not suggesting a publication with truncation enabled
> should just ignore replicating truncation if the downstream server
> doesn't support it? Because if that's the suggestion, then a strong -1
> from me on that.
Yes, that's the reason why we intentionally left it as it is now.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-07 12:59:58 | Re: START/END line number for COPY FROM |
Previous Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2019-01-07 12:04:08 | Problem with parallel_workers option (Was Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptions representation for each relation kind instead) |