| From: | "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Petr Jelinek" <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences |
| Date: | 2022-02-23 17:33:34 |
| Message-ID: | 4e158021-248d-43ad-95e5-943334bd1007@www.fastmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, at 1:07 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Maybe, but I don't think it's very common to have that many schemas
> added to the same publication. And it probably does not make much
> difference whether you have 1000 or 2000 items in the list - either both
> are acceptable or unacceptable, I think.
Wouldn't it confuse users? Hey, duplicate publication. How? Wait. Doh.
> I think just hard-coding this into CreatePublicationStmt would work, but
> it'll be an issue once/if we start adding more options. I'm not sure if
> it makes sense to replicate other relkinds, but maybe DDL?
Materialized view? As you mentioned DDL, maybe we can use the CREATE
PUBLICATION syntax to select which DDL commands we want to replicate.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2022-02-23 17:44:58 | Re: Allow file inclusion in pg_hba and pg_ident files |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-02-23 17:21:15 | Re: PATCH: add "--config-file=" option to pg_rewind |