From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Patrick B <patrickbakerbr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2 |
Date: | 2016-07-10 21:31:42 |
Message-ID: | 4deb2068-4d7c-45cd-758c-87c84604476a@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/10/2016 02:19 PM, Patrick B wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There will be a network maintenance at the company where my servers are...
>
> I've got one master and one slave server, running PostgreSQL 9.2.
>
> As the network will be down, the internet won't be working as well as
> the intranet. Both servers won't be able to communicate each other. Not
> by streaming replication and wal_files too.
>
> That should take at most 10 minutes.
>
> 1. When the connection comes back, will the master and slave work as
> expected? The streaming replication should be ok?
Assuming you have wal_keep_segments set high enough to keep the master
from recycling the WAL files before the network comes up again.
>
> 2. As the master will be down, I don't wanna slave turns into a master
> by Failover. The trigger_file line on recovery.conf on the slave server
> is commented, so should be ok here right? The slave will be still a
> slave once master is down....
>
> Thanks!
> Patrick
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2016-07-10 21:42:21 | Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2 |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-07-10 21:31:01 | Re: Streaming replication failover process - Pgsql 9.2 |