From: | jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc |
---|---|
To: | "chris" <chricki(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware advice for scalable warehouse db |
Date: | 2011-07-15 08:22:59 |
Message-ID: | 4dde2344d7a0c36fbac3b61a667bd99d.squirrel@shrek.krogh.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> 1 x Intel Xeon X5670, 6C, 2.93GHz, 12M Cache
> 16 GB (4x4GB) Low Volt DDR3 1066Mhz
> PERC H700 SAS RAID controller
> 4 x 300 GB 10k SAS 6Gbps 2.5" in RAID 10
Apart from Gregs excellent recommendations. I would strongly suggest
more memory. 16GB in 2011 is really on the low side.
PG is using memory (either shared_buffers og OS cache) for
keeping frequently accessed data in. Good recommendations are hard
without knowledge of data and access-patterns, but 64, 128 and 256GB
system are quite frequent when you have data that can't all be
in memory at once.
SAN's are nice, but I think you can buy a good DAS thing each year
for just the support cost of a Netapp, but you might have gotten a
really good deal there too. But you are getting a huge amount of
advanced configuration features and potential ways of sharing and..
and .. just see the specs.
.. and if you need those the SAN is a good way to go, but
they do come with a huge pricetag.
Jesper
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Svetlin Manavski | 2011-07-15 12:57:18 | Unexpected seq scans when expected result is 1 row out of milions |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2011-07-15 07:14:45 | Re: Inoptimal query plan for max() and multicolumn index |