Re: date function bug

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: date function bug
Date: 2019-10-23 14:46:03
Message-ID: 4d5e514f-4db9-0647-f6ba-6da0648a207b@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/23/19 7:22 AM, Abraham, Danny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The function "to_date" does not fail illegal values.
> Is this a known bug?
> What is the recommended type checking?
>
>
> ctrlmdb=> select to_date('2018100X','YYYYMMDD');
> to_date
> ------------
> 2018-10-01
> (1 row)
>
>

At:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/functions-formatting.html

I would read the section starting :

"Usage notes for date/time formatting: ..."

several times. There a lot of 'if and or buts' in there.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ravi Krishna 2019-10-23 14:55:34 Re: date function bug
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-10-23 14:44:52 Re: date function bug