Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: MAINTAIN privilege -- what do we need to un-revert it?
Date: 2024-02-17 00:03:55
Message-ID: 4d497d82e4516037dc1082d5a62d199ea00d62e7.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 13:02 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> This seemed like the approach folks were most in favor of at the
> developer
> meeting a couple weeks ago [0].  At least, that was my interpretation
> of
> the discussion.

Attached rebased version.

Note the changes in amcheck. It's creating functions and calling those
functions from the comparators, and so the comparators need to set the
search_path. I don't think that's terribly common, but does represent a
behavior change and could break something.

Regards,
Jef Davis

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Fix-search_path-to-a-safe-value-during-maintenanc.patch text/x-patch 26.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2024-02-17 00:31:07 Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-02-16 23:14:44 Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts