Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: arnaud(dot)listes(at)codata(dot)eu, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Date: 2020-01-16 18:58:56
Message-ID: 4d35af4afe030041cf9bea394a31c0bfad9bb3cb.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 12:09 +0100, Arnaud L. wrote:
> is it OK to set wal_level to minimal on the subscriber side of the
> logical replication ?

Yes, if you don't want physical backups.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arnaud L. 2020-01-17 07:43:44 Re: minimal wal_level on subscriber
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-01-16 18:51:24 Re: Inexplicable duplicate rows with unique constraint