Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column

From: Gilles Darold <gillesdarold(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Date: 2021-10-16 06:57:48
Message-ID: 4d2f6c5b-54d0-b28f-1660-ced08e17abc2@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 15/10/2021 à 18:42, Aleksander Alekseev a écrit :
> Hi Gilles,
>
>> Yes, I don't wanted to offend you or to troll. This was just to point
>> that the position of "SELECT * is bad practice" is not a good argument
>> in my point of view, just because it is allowed for every one. I mean
>> that in an extension or a client which allow user query input we must
>> handle the case.
> Sure, no worries. And my apologies if my feedback seemed a little harsh.
>
> I'm sure our goal is mutual - to make PostgreSQL even better than it
> is now. Finding a consensus occasionally can take time though.
>
Right, no problem Aleksander, my english speaking and understanding is
not very good so it doesn't help too.  Let's have a beer next time :-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilles Darold 2021-10-16 07:10:13 Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Previous Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-10-16 06:30:47 RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication