| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: proposal: schema variables |
| Date: | 2025-01-20 20:40:34 |
| Message-ID: | 4d2e713c026632e11afeb679088112339ea74e65.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 15:15 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, I think we passed the Desirability criteria with the feedback on
> this thread, but it is now a question of whether the code complexity
> justifies the feature. I saw a few people saying they want _some_ parts
> of the patch, which opens the suggestion that even people who want the
> patch are seeing parts of the patch that are too much. I have seen this
> patch circling around, and I think it needs a step a back for analysis.
I'd say that patches 1 to 6 from the patch set are essential.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker | 2025-01-20 20:42:45 | Re: pg_createsubscriber TAP test wrapping makes command options hard to read. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-01-20 20:27:21 | Re: [PATCH] Improve code coverage of network address functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-01-20 20:15:43 | Re: Re: proposal: schema variables |