Re: Reserving GUC prefixes from a non-preloaded DB extension is not always enforced

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Narek Galstyan <narekg(at)berkeley(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: narek(at)lantern(dot)dev
Subject: Re: Reserving GUC prefixes from a non-preloaded DB extension is not always enforced
Date: 2024-06-14 07:44:57
Message-ID: 4c63472a57a2b5843cbae3e4020216b433004861.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2024-06-13 at 12:26 -0700, Narek Galstyan wrote:
> I am an extension developer. I use `MarkGUCPrefixReserved` to reserve GUC prefixes,
> which my extension uses to help avoid accidentally misspelled config-file entries.
>
> However, since the reservation happens in `_PG_init()` and `_PG_init()` is not
> called until the first use of an API exposed by my extension, misspelled config-file
> entries that get executed before the extension is loaded will not throw an error.
>
> I'd expect GUC variables reserved by an extension to live more permanently in
> Postgres catalogs (e.g., in pg_settings). 
> So, even when the extension binary is not loaded, Postgres would know which prefixes
> are reserved and which GUC settings must be allowed (similar to how Postgres knows
> in pg_extension which extensions are enabled, even when the corresponding extension
> binary has not been loaded).
>
> > 1. Would you consider the proposed behavior an improvement?

Not really.

If I wanted to avoid that problem, I'd put the extension in "shared_preload_libraries",
so that _PG_init() is executed when the server starts.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2024-06-14 09:17:36 Re: Configure autovacuum
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2024-06-14 07:41:02 Re: Configure autovacuum