Re: Code of Conduct plan

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
Date: 2018-06-08 09:18:36
Message-ID: 4c23312d36e8e99878d440ba85023049@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 2018-06-08 09:46, Simon Riggs wrote:
<snip>
> Would it not be better to consider arbitration as the first step in
> dispute resolution?

This bit sounds like it'd need to be on a case-by-case basis.

It's pretty easy to imagine scenarios where arbitration wouldn't be
appropriate.

Whether or not they come about in the PG Community or not is a
different matter.

My point being that arbitration isn't necessarily automatically the
right direction.

I'd probably leave it up to the CoC team/people to figure it out. :)

+ Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2018-06-08 09:53:54 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-06-08 08:46:57 Re: Code of Conduct plan

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2018-06-08 09:27:02 Re: Can you make a simple view non-updatable?
Previous Message Ryan Murphy 2018-06-08 09:17:08 Re: Can you make a simple view non-updatable?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2018-06-08 09:53:54 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2018-06-08 08:53:13 Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2018-06-08 09:27:14 Request for "editor" privilege for PostgreSQL Wiki page
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-06-08 08:46:57 Re: Code of Conduct plan