| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
| Date: | 2022-05-04 15:45:55 |
| Message-ID: | 4c0d7a26-974d-7196-5700-0fa726289051@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 19.04.22 13:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I rebased this mostly out of curiousity. I fixed some smallish
> conflicts and fixed a typedef problem new in JSON support; however, even
> with these fixes it doesn't compile, because JsonPathSpec uses a novel
> typedef pattern that apparently will need bespoke handling in the
> gen_nodes_support.pl script. It seemed better to post this even without
> that, though.
I have committed your change to the JsonTableColumnType enum and the
removal of JsonPathSpec. Other than that and some whitespace changes, I
didn't find anything in your 0002 patch that was different from my last
submitted patch. Did I miss anything?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-05-04 16:03:07 | Re: automatically generating node support functions |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2022-05-04 15:44:01 | Re: JSON Functions and Operators Docs for v15 |