From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LONG delete with LOTS of FK's |
Date: | 2013-05-10 16:01:15 |
Message-ID: | 4bb82bf699e02bd51c67e9c118456cd2@webmail.lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2013-05-10 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> On 2013-05-10 09:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... and verify you get a cheap plan for each referencing table.
>
> We don't :(
>
> Ugh. I bet the problem is that in some of these tables, there are lots
> and lots of duplicate account ids, such that seqscans look like a good
> bet when searching for an otherwise-unknown id. You don't see this
> with a handwritten test for a specific id because then the planner can
> see it's not any of the common values.
>
> 9.2 would fix this for you --- any chance of updating?
>
> regards, tom lane
I'll see what we can do. I was looking for a reason, this may be it.
Thanks for all your help.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 (c) E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Evan D. Hoffman | 2013-05-10 16:11:07 | Re: Deploying PostgreSQL on CentOS with SSD and Hardware RAID |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-05-10 15:57:17 | Re: LONG delete with LOTS of FK's |