| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode |
| Date: | 2018-12-19 16:38:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4b9f1203-a374-099d-6102-ee6f014a8c26@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/12/18 4:44 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-12-12 11:32:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> +1 on all that. Per the trend of this thread, I see a bunch of
>> committers and contributors commenting about *not* removing this code,
>> so sending a patch to actually remove it looks like a throw into an
>> abysmal void.
>
> I don't think it's as clear as you make it out to be:
>
> In favor:
> - David Steele
> - Andres Freund
> - Stephen Frost, I think
> Against:
> - Simon Riggs
> - Robert Haas
> - Michael Paquier
> - Andreas Karlsson
> - Peter Eisentraut, I think
>
> While that's clearly lopsided, I still think it's pretty darn absurd to
> call such a situation "a throw into an abysmal void".
The way I read the discussion, there is no consensus for getting this
into PG12, but there does seem to be one for PG13.
I'll push this to the first post-PG12 CF when one appears. Can we just
go ahead and create a 2019-07 CF now? I know we generally discuss this
at PGCon, but we can always rename it, right?
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-19 16:44:06 | Re: Some memory allocations in gin fastupdate code are a bit brain dead |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-12-19 16:03:41 | Re: dropdb --force |