| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Date: | 2024-05-17 13:02:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4b4682f8-bc8f-4a86-a39d-1fc673d9f060@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.05.24 09:32, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Dunno about having to click a link or sparkly gold borders, but +1 on
> having a free-form text box for notes like that. Things like "cfbot says
> this has bitrotted" or "Will review this after other patch this depends
> on". On the mailing list, notes like that are both noisy and easily lost
> in the threads. But as a little free-form text box on the commitfest, it
> would be handy.
>
> One risk is that if we start to rely too much on that, or on the other
> fields in the commitfest app for that matter, we de-value the mailing
> list archives. I'm not too worried about it, the idea is that the
> summary box just summarizes what's already been said on the mailing
> list, or is transient information like "I'll get to this tomorrow"
> that's not interesting to archive.
We already have the annotations feature, which is kind of this.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-05-17 13:03:39 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-05-17 13:00:00 | Re: Streaming read-ready sequential scan code |