Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, mathias(at)brossard(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Date: 2019-03-28 09:12:18
Message-ID: 4b39b103-6c05-e86b-a811-e308f2330cb0@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-03-22 01:21, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2019/03/22 2:23, David Steele wrote:
>> On 3/14/19 6:19 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> On 2019/03/14 2:11, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've attached v11 of the patch, which merges most of Justin's changes and
>>>>> some of my own on top -- documentation and partition size column names.
>>>
>>> Maybe, we should set this ready for committer then?
>>
>> There don't appear to be any objections.  Perhaps you should do that?
>
> OK, done.

What is the purpose of this patch (hint: commit message)? The email
subject is "show size of partitioned table", which seems reasonable, but
looking briefly at a patch, it adds new psql commands to display
partitioned tables only. I don't understand the purpose of that.

(Moreover, who is the author of this patch? Is the commit fest entry
accurate?)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2019-03-28 09:29:52 Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-03-28 09:08:36 Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums