From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, mathias(at)brossard(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
Date: | 2019-03-28 09:12:18 |
Message-ID: | 4b39b103-6c05-e86b-a811-e308f2330cb0@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-03-22 01:21, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2019/03/22 2:23, David Steele wrote:
>> On 3/14/19 6:19 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> On 2019/03/14 2:11, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've attached v11 of the patch, which merges most of Justin's changes and
>>>>> some of my own on top -- documentation and partition size column names.
>>>
>>> Maybe, we should set this ready for committer then?
>>
>> There don't appear to be any objections. Perhaps you should do that?
>
> OK, done.
What is the purpose of this patch (hint: commit message)? The email
subject is "show size of partitioned table", which seems reasonable, but
looking briefly at a patch, it adds new psql commands to display
partitioned tables only. I don't understand the purpose of that.
(Moreover, who is the author of this patch? Is the commit fest entry
accurate?)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-03-28 09:29:52 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-03-28 09:08:36 | Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums |