Re: Add --check option to pgindent

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add --check option to pgindent
Date: 2023-12-13 20:46:08
Message-ID: 4b390361-484d-7598-ac13-db2dd7072ad3@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-12-12 Tu 10:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2023-Dec-12, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> writes:
>>> When you add exceptions, it starts to complicate the UI.
>> Indeed. It seems like --silent-diff was poorly defined and poorly
>> named, and we need to rethink that option along the way to adding
>> this behavior. The idea that --show-diff and --silent-diff can
>> be used together is just inherently confusing, because they sound
>> like opposites
> Maybe it's enough to rename --silent-diff to --check. You can do
> "--show-diff --check" and get both the error and the diff printed; or
> just "--check" and it'll throw an error without further ado; or
> "--show-diff" and it will both apply the diff and print it.
>

That seems reasonable. These features were fairly substantially debated
when we put them in, but I'm fine with some tweaking. But note:
--show-diff doesn't apply the diff, it's intentionally non-destructive.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tristan Partin 2023-12-13 20:59:11 Re: Clean up find_typedefs and add support for Mac
Previous Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2023-12-13 20:42:45 [BUG] autovacuum may skip tables when session_authorization/role is set on database