Re: Putting the O/S user for "local" "peer" authentication in the "postgres" group vs chmod'ing the "pg*.conf" files to be readable by "all"

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Putting the O/S user for "local" "peer" authentication in the "postgres" group vs chmod'ing the "pg*.conf" files to be readable by "all"
Date: 2022-11-03 03:26:24
Message-ID: 4a9f5b28-73a6-383f-7714-00c450924f3f@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>  "Additionally, while reading the next chapter, Server Setup and
> Operation, is recommended if you are using a binary package the setup
> and operational environment it creates is likely to be somewhat
> different than what is described in this documentation.  Please read
> the documentation for the packages you install to learn how it behaves
> and what additional platform-specific features it provides."
>
>
I wonder if "binary package" would confuse some apt/yum/etc users? 
Maybe "package supplied from a distributor"?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shashidhar Reddy 2022-11-03 06:48:05 unable to install postgreql 13.4
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-11-03 01:41:36 Re: Putting the O/S user for "local" "peer" authentication in the "postgres" group vs chmod'ing the "pg*.conf" files to be readable by "all"