Re: pgsql: Fix integer-overflow problems in interval comparison.

On 4/5/17 23:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fix integer-overflow problems in interval comparison.

> Branch
> ------
> REL9_4_STABLE
>
> Details
> -------
> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/8851bcf8813baa0ea393ef9d2894d15b3f13f957
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c | 65 ++++++++--
> src/include/common/int128.h | 231 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/test/regress/expected/interval.out | 64 +++++++++
> src/test/regress/sql/interval.sql | 27 ++++
> 4 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

This is failing cpluspluscheck now because C++ does not have
_Static_assert, which is used in int128.h.

I suppose this header is not intended for public consumption, at least
in the back branches, so it would be OK to exclude it from the check.
Perhaps a different solution would be appropriate in master.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services