| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Doc: remove some long-obsolete information from installation.sgm |
| Date: | 2019-09-01 20:59:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4a023388-8652-fea0-a0b4-35ad5e734e9a@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 2019-08-30 19:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Doc: remove some long-obsolete information from installation.sgml.
- It is a fully native build and uses no additional software like
- MinGW. A ready-made installer is available on the main
- PostgreSQL web site.
+ The Visual C++ build is recommended, as it is fully native and uses no
+ additional software like MinGW. A ready-made installer is available on
+ the main PostgreSQL web site.
Is this correct? MinGW builds are also native builds. The old wording
was shaky but the new wording (inserting "... is recommended, as ...")
makes it sound like that there is something wrong with the MinGW build
compared to the MSVC build.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-09-01 21:22:03 | pgsql: Fix compiler warning |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-08-31 18:05:50 | pgsql: Doc: describe the "options" allowed in an ECPG connection target |