| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
| Date: | 2019-04-11 04:06:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4a01d75c-3ff8-1339-0c7c-513931d56392@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019/04/11 12:34, David Rowley wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 00:51, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Just so I don't forget about this, I've added it to the July 'fest.
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2065/
>
> Now that we have 428b260f8, I think the version of this that goes into
> master should be more like the attached.
Thanks, looks good.
I've posted a patch last week on the "speed up partition planning" thread
[1] which modifies ddl.sgml to remove the text about UPDATE/DELETE using
constraint exclusion under the covers. Do you think there's any merit to
combining that with this one?
Thanks,
Amit
[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4f049572-9440-3c99-afa1-f7ca7f38fe80%40lab.ntt.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2019-04-11 04:08:14 | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2019-04-11 04:01:45 | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |