Re: PostgreSQL limitations question

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
Cc: Bartosz Dmytrak <bdmytrak(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL limitations question
Date: 2012-07-12 13:31:41
Message-ID: 4FFED1BD.10702@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 07/12/2012 12:39 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 02:16 PM, Bartosz Dmytrak wrote:
>>
>> it doesn't metter - conclusion is: table is growing. You are right,
>> for other purposes it should be better to check total size.
>>
>
> In that case, I'm not sure I understand what you were actually asking in
> your initial question.

I understood it to be asking about the conflict between the two
statements below:

Maximum Table Size 32 TB
Maximum Rows per Table Unlimited

If a table has a maximum size and rows have size then at some point you
will reach a limit on number of rows per table.

>
> --
> Craig Ringer

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wolfgang Keller 2012-07-12 13:35:10 Re: Pg CRUD for joined tables
Previous Message ashish_karalkar@yahoo.com 2012-07-12 12:36:59