Re: 9.2beta web issues

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues
Date: 2012-07-11 20:46:46
Message-ID: 4FFDE636.7010003@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


> +1. Adding a mailing list is not exactly the hardest part of getting
> a formal QA effort going. Moreover, if the previous rationale for having
> pgsql-testing was that it was a place where newbies could feel sheltered
> while posting bug reports, how are the existing subscribers going to
> relate to what Josh is now suggesting? Repurposing this list for that
> usage seems entirely inappropriate.

Well, the ones who've spoken up would be fine with it. But I'm not sure
how many people are on now.

If we kill the list, though, I'll be directing people to submit
*successful* test reports (i.e. "this worked") to pgsql-bugs. Please
make sure that's what you want.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2012-07-11 20:52:02 Re: 9.2beta web issues
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-07-11 12:46:12 Re: Linux Downloads page change