From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2beta web issues |
Date: | 2012-07-10 18:15:00 |
Message-ID: | 4FFC7124.3050700@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 7/10/12 11:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jul 10 13:55:26 -0400 2012:
>>
>>> apart from the typo in the second one(what automated processing btw - is
>>> that google docs?) I basically parse both version as "this is the
>>> official way to report bugs in beta/alpha", I'm not sure this is
>>> actually understood by every community member and a sensible split of
>>> traffic between -bugs and hackers...
>>
>> Yeah, we should update that description.
>
> Just let me know a suitable wording and I'll put it up in both places.
>
Archives:
"For active testers of PostgreSQL Alphas and Betas who want to discuss
testing."
MJ:
"The pgsql-testers mailing list is for users committed to helping with
Alpha and Beta testing of new versions of PostgreSQL to discuss testing."
BTW, I'm mainly interested in preserving the pgsql-testers mailing list
for future use; I'm still hoping to find time to get a serious volunteer
QA effort together, in which case it will need a mailing list. So we
could kill off pgsql-testers now, but I'll probably just be asking to
revive it next year if you do.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-07-10 18:29:57 | Re: 9.2beta web issues |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-07-10 18:06:11 | Re: 9.2beta web issues |