Re: 9.2beta web issues

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues
Date: 2012-07-10 18:15:00
Message-ID: 4FFC7124.3050700@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 7/10/12 11:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jul 10 13:55:26 -0400 2012:
>>
>>> apart from the typo in the second one(what automated processing btw - is
>>> that google docs?) I basically parse both version as "this is the
>>> official way to report bugs in beta/alpha", I'm not sure this is
>>> actually understood by every community member and a sensible split of
>>> traffic between -bugs and hackers...
>>
>> Yeah, we should update that description.
>
> Just let me know a suitable wording and I'll put it up in both places.
>

Archives:

"For active testers of PostgreSQL Alphas and Betas who want to discuss
testing."

MJ:

"The pgsql-testers mailing list is for users committed to helping with
Alpha and Beta testing of new versions of PostgreSQL to discuss testing."

BTW, I'm mainly interested in preserving the pgsql-testers mailing list
for future use; I'm still hoping to find time to get a serious volunteer
QA effort together, in which case it will need a mailing list. So we
could kill off pgsql-testers now, but I'll probably just be asking to
revive it next year if you do.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-07-10 18:29:57 Re: 9.2beta web issues
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-07-10 18:06:11 Re: 9.2beta web issues