| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2beta web issues |
| Date: | 2012-07-10 17:47:12 |
| Message-ID: | 4FFC6AA0.1060903@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 07/10/2012 01:22 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>>> I think we should completely drop all references to the google docs
>>> thingy and the -testers list there and redirect people simply to -bugs
>>> and/or hackers.
>
> Oh, dammit. I thought I took the google thing out when we went beta,
> but apparently I didn't save my changes.
>
> People do use -testers. While -bugs/-hackers is superior for
> experienced testers, submitting stuff to those lists can be a bit
> intimidating.
hmm I'm still wondering if it is a good thing, the description of the
list on the archives is "For active testers of PostgreSQL Alphas and
Betas to report test results." or if you ask mj2:
"The pgsql-testers mailing list is for users committed to helping with
Alpha and Beta testing of new versions of PostgreSQL. It is also use for
automated processing of testing results. "
apart from the typo in the second one(what automated processing btw - is
that google docs?) I basically parse both version as "this is the
official way to report bugs in beta/alpha", I'm not sure this is
actually understood by every community member and a sensible split of
traffic between -bugs and hackers...
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-07-10 17:55:26 | Re: 9.2beta web issues |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-07-10 17:42:25 | Re: 9.2beta web issues |