Re: Pruning the TODO list

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pruning the TODO list
Date: 2012-06-30 09:39:09
Message-ID: 4FEEC93D.500@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 06/22/2012 05:38 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think the real problem with the TODO list is that some people see it
> as some sort of official roadmap, and it really isn't. Neither is there
> anything else that is.

To me, it looks like TODO is just a misnomer. The file should be named
TODISCUSS, IDEAS, or something. But the current file name implies consensus.

Wouldn't renaming solve that kind of misunderstanding? (..in the vain of
"address(ing) real problems in the simplest way"..)

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2012-06-30 09:51:31 XX000: enum value 117721 not found in cache for enum enumcrash
Previous Message Amit kapila 2012-06-30 07:11:15 patch-3 (3-allow-wal-record-header-to-be-split.patch)WAL Format Changes