Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-06-26 22:20:06
Message-ID: 4FEA3596.3060501@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> This can be trivially reproduced if one runs an old (SysV shared memory-based) postgresql alongside a potentially newer postgresql with a smaller SysV segment. This can occur with applications that bundle postgresql as part of the app.

I'm not saying it doesn't happen at all. I'm saying it's not the 80%
case.

So let's fix the 80% case with something we feel confident in, and then
revisit the no-sysv interlock as a separate patch. That way if we can't
fix the interlock issues, we still have a reduced-shmem version of Postgres.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-06-26 22:20:49 Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Previous Message A.M. 2012-06-26 22:15:48 Re: Posix Shared Mem patch