From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)versed(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: libpq compression |
Date: | 2012-06-26 15:29:33 |
Message-ID: | 4FE9D55D.6030807@timbira.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26-06-2012 12:23, Robert Haas wrote:
> At the risk of making everyone laugh at me, has anyone tested pglz? I
> observe that if the compression ration and performance are good, we
> might consider using it for this purpose, too, which would avoid
> having to add dependencies. Conversely, if they are bad, and we
> decide to support another algorithm, we might consider also using that
> other algorithm, at least optionally, for the purposes for which we
> now use pglz.
>
I'll remember to test it too.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-26 15:30:43 | Re: How to avoid base backup in automated failover |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-26 15:28:23 | Re: GiST subsplit question |