Re: libpq compression

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)versed(dot)se>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2012-06-25 15:36:00
Message-ID: 4FE88560.3090807@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24-06-2012 23:04, Robert Haas wrote:
> So I think we really
> need someone to try this both ways and compare. Right now it seems
> like we're mostly speculating on how well either approach would work,
> which is not as good as having some experimental results.
>
Not a problem. That's what I'm thinking too but I would like to make sure that
others don't object to general idea. Let me give it a try in both ideas...

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-06-25 15:50:25 Re: pg_upgrade broken by xlog numbering
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-25 15:34:21 Re: [PATCH 04/16] Add embedded list interface (header only)