Performance of CLUSTER

From: Mark Thornton <mthornton(at)optrak(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Performance of CLUSTER
Date: 2012-06-10 08:20:26
Message-ID: 4FD458CA.3070902@optrak.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

What is the expected performance of cluster and what tuning parameters
have most effect?

I have a set of 5 tables with identical structure (all inherit a common
table). The sizes given are total relation size. The clustering index is
a gist index on a (non null) geographic(linestring) column

1. 327600 rows, 105MB, 15.8s
2. 770165 rows, 232MB, 59.5s
3. 1437041 rows, 424MB, 140s
4. 3980922 rows, 1167MB, 276s
5. 31843368 rows, 9709MB, ~ 10 hours

Server is version 9.1. with postgis 1.5.4.

Regards,
Mark Thornton

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Klemme 2012-06-10 11:16:40 Re: partitioning performance question
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-06-10 03:26:41 Re: pg 9.1 brings host machine down