| From: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extension table data |
| Date: | 2012-06-09 08:54:55 |
| Message-ID: | 4FD30F5F.8050809@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2012-06-09 08:56, Keith Fiske wrote:
> Looking at the docs, I think the extension authors may have only had
> configuration data in mind for extension tables. I don't see any
> reason why we shouldn't be able to put any sort of table in our
> extensions, some having actual data, not just config.
True. We've made several extensions that consist only of table data,
such as contents of medical codesystems, where the actual terminology
comes from another extension that has functions and empty codesystem
tables. I remember there were some issues making it. IIRC the table data
would not be dropped on extension drop.
regards,
Yeb
--
Yeb Havinga
http://www.mgrid.net/
Mastering Medical Data
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-09 12:33:57 | Re: Extension table data |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-06-09 07:50:19 | Re: Postgres 9.2 beta2 one-click installer on windows |