| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)ilande(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Interrupting long external library calls | 
| Date: | 2012-05-24 13:55:34 | 
| Message-ID: | 4FBE3DD6.7070305@enterprisedb.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On 24.05.2012 16:04, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 07:30:03PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 16.05.2012 15:42, Sandro Santilli wrote:
>>> But CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS doesn't return, right ?
>>> Is there another macro for just checking w/out yet acting upon it ?
>>
>> Hmm, no. CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() checks the InterruptPending
>> variable, but on Windows it also checks for
>> UNBLOCKED_SIGNAL_QUEUE(). And even if InterruptPending is set, it's
>> not totally certain that CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() won't return. I
>> think InterruptPending can be set spuriously (even if that's not
>> possible today, I wouldn't rely on it), and if you're in a
>> HOLD/RESUME_INTERRUPTS block, CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() will do nothing
>> even if InterruptPending is true.
>>
>> The only sane way to make 3rd party code interruptible is to add
>> CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to it, in safe places.
>
> No place is safe if CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS doesn't return.
> How could caller code cleanup on interruption ?
It would only be safe to call it in places where no cleanup is 
necessary. I don't know if there are any such places in the geos library.
-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2012-05-24 14:13:25 | Re: "could not open relation with OID" errors after promoting the standby to master | 
| Previous Message | Sergey Koposov | 2012-05-24 13:24:38 | 9.2beta1, parallel queries, ReleasePredicateLocks, CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the oprofile |