From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Nielsen <jan(dot)sture(dot)nielsen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Configuration Recommendations |
Date: | 2012-05-24 04:59:44 |
Message-ID: | 4FBDC040.2000406@catalyst.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 20/05/12 03:47, Jan Nielsen wrote:
> In this test, the local mount's buffered reads perform best around RA~10k @
> 150MB/sec then starts a steady decline. The SAN mount has a similar but
> more subtle decline with a maximum around RA~5k @ 80MB/sec but with much
> greater variance. I was surprised at the 80MB/sec for the SAN - I was
> expecting 150MB/sec - and I'm also surprised at the variance. I understand
> that there are many more elements involved for the SAN: more drives,
> network overhead& latency, iscsi, etc. but I'm still surprised.
>
> Is this expected behavior for a SAN mount or is this a hint at some
> misconfiguration? Thoughts?
>
>
Is the SAN mount via iSCSI? If so and also if the connection is a
single 1Gbit interface then 80MB/s is reasonable. You might get closer
to 100MB/s by tweaking things like MTU for the interface concerned, but
to get more performance either bonding several 1Gbit links or using
10Gbit is required.
Regards
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Kumar. Mallah | 2012-05-24 05:26:47 | Re: High load average in 64-core server , no I/O wait and CPU is idle |
Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2012-05-24 03:53:43 | Re: High load average in 64-core server , no I/O wait and CPU is idle |