From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE |
Date: | 2012-05-22 17:18:41 |
Message-ID: | 4FBBCA71.3080505@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> 1. Ability to have a Role that can only access one Database
>
> 2. Allow user info to be dumped with a database, to make a db
> completely self-consistent
>
> 3. Allow databases to be transportable
>
> 4. Allow users to access tables in >1 database easily, with appropriate rights.
The last requirement seems completely contradictory to the other three.
Either we're trying to make databases even more isolated as
multi-tenant Catalogs, or we're not. Trying to do both at the same time
is failure-by-design.
Given that we offer schema as an alternative to multiple databases, and
users are starting to get used to them, I think that requirement (4) is
just a bad idea, and not worth pursuing, except in the context of pgsql_fdw.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-05-22 17:24:35 | Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2012-05-22 17:15:33 | Re: How could we make it simple to access the log as a table? |