| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PeterEisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Credit in the release notes WAS: Draft release notes complete |
| Date: | 2012-05-13 06:34:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4FAF55FB.2000803@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I haven't yet heard any very good argument for deviating from our
>> past practice, which is to credit just the principal author(s)
>> of each patch, not reviewers.
>
> Is that what people want? Reviewers are easily removed. What about
> committers who adjust the patch?
Well, I still think we should give credit to the reviewers ... in a
single section at the bottom, where we list each reviewers' name once.
Reviewers for this release: ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2012-05-13 15:45:03 | Re: Analyzing foreign tables & memory problems |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-13 04:42:41 | Re: Credit in the release notes WAS: Draft release notes complete |