Re: 2 machines, same database, same query, 10 times slower?

From: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2 machines, same database, same query, 10 times slower?
Date: 2012-05-09 22:29:15
Message-ID: 4FAAEFBB.9050600@fuzzy.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9.5.2012 22:50, Antonio Goméz Soto wrote:
> Tomas,
>
> running vacuum full cdr brought down the query time to 4 seconds..

Fine. I'd recommend checking the other tables too - if this one was
bloated, it's likely there might be others.

Anyway, you should find out how this happened and fix it. This kind of
bloat is usually caused by either frequent changes (updated / deletes)
without sufficient vacuuming, or batch updates hitting many rows at once
(e.g. during maintenance).

Or maybe the vacuum was not running at all - I do remember there were
frequent issues with free-space map. See this:

http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html#maxfsmp
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server

That should give you a good idea.

Tomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksey Tsalolikhin 2012-05-10 01:06:22 Re: how to amend SQL standard to add comments?
Previous Message Antonio Goméz Soto 2012-05-09 20:50:39 Re: 2 machines, same database, same query, 10 times slower?