Re: UFS2 Snapshots and Postgres

From: Eduardo Morras <nec556(at)retena(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UFS2 Snapshots and Postgres
Date: 2012-06-25 14:34:11
Message-ID: 4FA8827200CA8809@
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 15:16 25/06/2012, you wrote:

>On 6/25/2012 7:35 AM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
>>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>I'm using FreeBSD 9 for Postgres and want to know if these actions
>>are safe for make a backup of the database:
>>
>>a) call pg_start_backup('b1')
>>b) take an UFS2 snapshot of data files
>>c) call pg_stop_backup()
>>d) change to the snapshot dir and rsync/dd/dump/transfer it to
>>backup file server
>>
>>Is it safe to call pg_start_backup('b1',true)?
>>
>>Thanks in advance
>Snapshots are "safe" (but will result in a roll-forward on restart)
>IF AND ONLY IF the log data and database table spaces are all on the
>same snapshotted volume.
>
>IF THEY ARE NOT then it will probably work 95% of the time, and the
>other 5% it will be unrecoverable. Be very, very careful -- the
>snapshot must in fact snapshot ALL of the involved database volumes
>(log data included!) at the same instant.

Even if i do a pg_start_backup()? I thought it set db data/ files in
a consistent state and puts in wal files the new transactions and
apply them when call pg_stop_backup().

I must do it other way then :(

Thanks

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haszlakiewicz, Eric 2012-06-25 14:59:06 Re: retrieving function raise messages in ecpg embedded sql code
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-06-25 14:34:00 Re: UFS2 Snapshots and Postgres