Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Date: 2012-04-30 22:44:20
Message-ID: 4F9F15C4.8030202@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 4/30/12 3:40 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
>> mean anything.
>
> Indeed. Just take a survey of programming languages.

Oh, and also: Object-Relational != Object-Oriented

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-05-01 00:20:04 Call for Lightning Talks for pgCon
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2012-04-30 22:40:52 Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?