From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Future In-Core Replication |
Date: | 2012-04-27 00:26:52 |
Message-ID: | 4F99E7CC.9000506@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon,
> I'm beginning to work on advanced additions to in-core replication for
> PostgreSQL.
...
> Those are the basic requirements that I am trying to address. There
> are a great many important details, but the core of this is probably
> what I would call "logical replication", that is shipping changes to
> other nodes in a way that does not tie us to the same physical
> representation that recovery/streaming replication does now. Of
> course, non-physical replication can take many forms.
So, I'm a bit confused. You talk about this as "additions to in-core
replication", but then you talk about implementing logical replication,
which would NOT be an addition to Binary replication. Can you explain
what you mean?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-04-27 00:51:17 | Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-27 00:03:44 | Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two |