| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Krzysztof Nienartowicz <krzysztof(dot)nienartowicz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Namespace of array of user defined types is confused by the parser in insert? |
| Date: | 2012-04-24 14:10:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4F96B450.9050609@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 04/24/2012 05:12 AM, Krzysztof Nienartowicz wrote:
>
> These types are qualified when created - the error does not happen on
> creation - there are two types in two different namespaces - it
> happens only on insert where it is not possible to qualify the type's
> namespace.
> It looks like a bug in the planner to me.
>
If it is please present a self-contained case demonstrating the bug,
preferably using psql rather than JDBC. Was all this done with the same
user / search path throughout the session (no connection pooling, for
example)? A complete log of the session (with log_statements,
log_connections and log_disconnections all turned on) might also help.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Emi Lu | 2012-04-24 14:15:26 | Simple way to get missing number |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2012-04-24 10:10:32 | Re: how to make an SQL UPDATE from record returning function |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-24 14:11:26 | Re: Usage of planner_ctx |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-24 13:24:58 | Re: Postgres install program files folder |