Re: Last gasp

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-12 17:38:15
Message-ID: 4F871307.5010109@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/12/2012 11:34 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The specific suggestion that vendors are not taking contributors
> seriously unless they have commit-bits is perhaps something that
> requires education of vendors, or perhaps my blogging about this will
> help.

I'm glad I managed to vent my frustration in this area in a way that was
helpful. Just recognize that any experienced person at pitching
software solutions will tell you to never wander down this path at all.
If you have to tell someone a story and make them admit they're wrong
about something as an early step toward adoption, you've just dumped a
home-made FUD bomb on them. It's not a high percentage path toward
credibility.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-04-12 19:27:57 Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-04-12 17:03:21 Re: [HACKERS] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ?