Re: Server choice for small workload : raptors or SSD?

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server choice for small workload : raptors or SSD?
Date: 2012-03-21 22:54:25
Message-ID: 4F6A5C21.6050102@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


We've used Raptors in production for a few years.
They've been about as reliable as you'd expect for hard
drives, with the additional excitement of a firmware bug
early on that led to data loss and considerable expense.

New machines deployed since November last year have 710 SSDs.
No problems so far, blindingly fast, very low power.

Unless I needed to store vast amounts of data, or was
required to use very cheap hardware, there's nothing that
would make me go back to hard drives.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2012-03-21 23:29:00 Re: Large Databases redux
Previous Message Rory Campbell-Lange 2012-03-21 22:47:33 Server choice for small workload : raptors or SSD?