Re: FDWs, foreign servers and user mappings

From: Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>
To: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FDWs, foreign servers and user mappings
Date: 2012-03-08 15:04:42
Message-ID: 4F58CA8A.3030105@freedomcircle.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 03/08/2012 12:06 AM, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> I think that makes, and will make sense. Because SQL/MED standard
> mentions about schema for only foreign table in "4.12 SQL-schemas" section.
>
> FYI, pgAdmin III shows them as a tree like:
>
> Database
> FDW
> Server
> User Mapping
> Schema
> Foreign Table

Thanks. Incidentally, what version of pgAdmin shows that? I didn't see
it in 1.14.0.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dennis jenkins 2012-03-08 15:23:04 Re: Synchronous replication + Fusion-io = waste of money OR significant performance boost? (compared to normal SATA-based SSD-disks)?
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-03-08 14:52:09 Re: Synchronous replication + Fusion-io = waste of money OR significant performance boost? (compared to normal SATA-based SSD-disks)?